Responses to opposition submissions only.  No economic analysis.

Invalid analysis of proposed New Building submitted on behalf of Synagogue Trustees.

Or, Google this site using a term of interest.  Unless indexed by Google, however, it will not be found.

Background, Conclusions, and analysis showing Synagogue submissions incorrect and unresponsive to BSA requirements.

Compares actual Sabbath attendance of 36 with Shelly Friedman’s a vibrant “up to 500”.

Shows that real returns are several times greater than those claimed in CSI proposals.

List of critical Synagogue errors and consequences, submitted at BSA hearing on 15 April 2008.

Presentation to BSA hearing on 15 April ’08 concerning two types of hardship.

Cost and financial retrurn on purchase of property, with supporting documents.

Describes the Synagogue’s access to wealth while claiming financial hardship.

Discussion of financial hardship required for findings 72-21 (a) and (e).  Commissioner asserts irrelevance.

Reports true profitability of 4 New Building alternatives.  Appendixes, including Synagogue schedules.

Board of Standards & Appeals approval of Congregation Shearith Israel waivers application.

Proposed condos do subsidize Community House but Acq. Cost just confuses, misleads.